[Dream] cpu usage
supergroover
drs.supergroover at gmail.com
Fri May 4 00:36:13 PDT 2007
i mean comparing two vsts with the same sounds and fx etc vs 1 (same) vst
with those same sounds (from a capable vst of course).
a) one vst named x is doing sound 1 and 2
b) vst named x is doing sound 1 & vst named x is doing sound 2
which set up uses more?
havent had a change to do your test yet.. i ll get to that this weekend i
hope.
=)
grtz raoul
On 5/4/07, Andrei Henry <andreihenry at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> i agree with troy, but in the end the answer depends
> on which VSTs you're comparing - you haven't old us if
> you're talking about using two instances of the same
> VSTi or different instruments.
>
> using two simple monophonic VSTi is bound to take up
> less memory than, say, an Arturia minimoog VSTi.
>
> on the other hand, there might be a good reason to use
> two instances of the same VSTi - running out of
> voices, output routing, fx, etc.
>
> in the end, why don't you try both configs and see
> where your CPU meter peaks? we're talking abstract
> theory here (so abstract, in fact, that we don't even
> know what we're comparing), whereas the only answer
> that counts for you is real-world application on your
> computer using your VSTi's.
>
> 'd
>
>
> --- tsheets at saturn5.com wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I am pretty sure it is better to use 1 VSTi with 2
> > sounds.
> >
> > Certainly that setup will use less memory. And that
> > always means better
> > performance.
> >
> > -troy
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 01:23:21PM +0200,
> > supergroover wrote:
> > > howdy all,
> > > was just wondering a little about cpu usage.
> > > Does it matter for cpu usage if i use two vsti
> > (multitimbral synth)
> > > separatly for 2 sounds or one vsti with two sounds
> > for two sounds.
> > >
> > > ie i make two separate miditracks in ableton with
> > two loaded synths or could
> > > i better use one miditrack with one multitimbral
> > synth.
> > > In both instances all the calculations still have
> > to be done. And both
> > > sounds are just as complicated. Which way is more
> > cpu friendly or are they
> > > the same?
> > >
> > > Hope that makes sense..
> > >
> > > thnx!
> > >
> > > grtz raoul
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> DreamWeavers mailing list
> DreamWeavers at enabled.com
> http://lists.enabled.com/mailman/listinfo/dreamweavers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.enabled.com/pipermail/dreamweavers/attachments/20070504/e456c397/attachment.htm
More information about the DreamWeavers
mailing list